In contrast samurais did not own any land and instead paid in rice. Loyalty to the lords was placed upon a very high virtue. Knights gained land from their military service while also obeying the lord’s. Another factor faced the European and Japanese systems was land ownership. Europeans wore heavier armor and samurais would wear lightweight armor with the disadvantage of protection in battles. The knights armor was made out of plate metal or chain mail in contrast the samurai wore leather and metal. Knights and samurais rode horses and wore armor. Therefore, Knights needed to obey the concept of chivalry meanwhile samurais were needed to follow bushido desires. In both situations warrior followed the code of conduct. Europe called them knights in contrast samurai in japan, warriors tend to obey local lords. In both worlds of feudalism, warfare classified warrior to be the most prominent class. There weren’t enough opportunities for social moliblitaty, children of lords’ expectations was to become ladies as well as lords, the child of a poor peasant would become peasants. Hence, nobles are considered higher class, continued by warriors, than left serfs and farmers are hosted below of the class. In both time periods, they were based on system named hereditary of social status. It is a shocking news to all of us that Japanese feudalism is similar to feudalism in Europe even though it’s 400 years apart.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |